Discussion about this post

User's avatar
E ultreia's avatar

This is a fantastic introduction, and such an immense undertaking ! I'm going to have to read it a few more times i think :) Though i thought i'd share something because the passage where you wrote that no visual artists went to space (before 2021 that is) reminded me of Alexei Leonov - a russian cosmonaut, the first man to walk in space in 1965. He was artist first, and joined the military to support his family. He somehow found his way in the soviet space program and was the first person to make art in space - a view of the sun made with colorpencils. To think of the diffculty to bring *anything* in space, and the dangers of it at the time, and they still found a way to give him paper and pencils... He made a lot of paintings about his space travels, as well as a more "finished" rendition of the sketch he did in space (you can see it in this article https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/31/first-picture-space-cosmonauts-science-museum-alexei-leonov and here an account of his first mission that absolutely gave me vertigo https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/the-nightmare-of-voskhod-2-8655378/ ) I know you were making a point about the hurtful split between art and science when it comes to the exploration of the universe, and the point stands ! But i cannot help but think of Alexei doodling in space, unaware he is the exception to the rule x)

Expand full comment
Michael Haines's avatar

I love your approach and the Grandmother Paradox is perfect :)

Like you, I’ve taken a wide interest in many facets of human activity.

Long ago, I concluded that science was largely based on the derivation of mathematical models of theoretical forms and their theoretical properties that together with certain theoretical constants and theoretical laws, determine their theoretical behaviour

We say a theory is valid when the theoretical behaviour of the theoretical forms maps or predicts the observed behaviour of observed forms. That is all.

No theory can ever get at the ‘essence’ of the forms, or of this Consciousness in which and to which the theories and the observations appear.

Nor can they say anything about the ‘lived experience’: the thrill and terror of battle, eating a meal with friends, arguing with the kids, listening to a sublime symphony or dancing to the beat of hard rock, noticing the foul stench of rotting garbage in a back alley... or any of the infinite experiences that arise within Awareness.

Good luck... I’ll be reading :)

Expand full comment
45 more comments...

No posts